Showing posts with label 2014 election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2014 election. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Meet Dr. Bryan Terry for TN's 48th District



Dr. Bryan Terry is running for State House Representative for District 48 (the seat soon to be vacated by Joe Carr). I have known Dr. Terry for several months and he has been kind enough to talk with me about his political positions and world view. I reached out to the other candidates in this race, asking them to take part in my questionnaire. They ignored me. Dr. Terry on the other hand, took the time to give detailed answers and explanations to my questions. I would like to share those answers with you and broaden the scope of this article to dive more into his views and the method he uses to come to his conclusions.

A Quick Bio

Dr. Terry was born in Oklahoma and is a member of the Choctaw Nation. His family has been in the farming and auto-salvage for generations and Dr. Terry spent much of his youth working for his family business. He began to study medicine and as a medical intern in 1995, he was actually working in the local ER during the horrific Oklahoma City Bombing, which killed 168 and injured nearly 700, and helped to treat many of the casualties.

He has been married to his wife, Cheryl, for 21 years and has two children, Brayden and Breeley. Dr. Terry has lived in the area for 16 years and is a license anesthesiologists working at MTMC; as such, he would be the only doctor serving in the State House if elected.

Dr. Terry takes great pains to think about problems and to find the best solutions to apply. He is required to be methodical in his profession (lives really are on the line), but beyond that, the way he thinks is truly a part who he is, not just something he learned. He takes the time to study an issue and to arrive at a solution based on evidence and reality. While you may or may not agree with his ideas, there can be no doubt that his conclusions are sound, and not merely the product of knee-jerk reactions or towing a particular line just to get elected.

Two questions I asked him relating to why he decided to and his background were:

Why run for office?

I know that my parents worked long and hard in the auto salvage business to see that I would have better opportunities than them, and I did.  However, over the years, I have seen the political establishment from both parties make things worse all in the name of helping. 

For me, my passion is my children and their generation.  I go to work every day with my children on my mind looking to give them a better life.  I will continue working as a physician to do just that, but if I don’t work just as hard for the values, liberties and ideals that we value, then I am not doing all that I can.  

What sets you apart from other candidates?

I have a very unique background compared to a lot of people either in office or running for office. My grandparents, parents and I all worked in our auto salvage.  Because of my severe asthma and allergies, I took personal responsibility to heart, and worked to become a physician.  

Additionally, having been involved with patient care following the domestic terrorist bombing of the Murrah Building (Oklahoma City) and having a family farm destroyed by a tornado are two heartbreaking, yet spiritually growing opportunities that, to my knowledge, are unique to me.  I think that these experiences, as well as my background, provide me with a real world foundation that when combined with my principles, process, and passion will allow me to reach out in a manner that speaks to the constituents, as well as, be able to carry a message for the district.

His Process

Before I get into specific issues, I want to explain the principles and process he uses when determining a solution or position. For me, if you can't explain why you came to a conclusion, or you can't defend your ideas with anything more than "because", then you're just an ideologue (basically, towing the party line without question).

Dr. Terry's three main principles are 1) Do no harm; 2) Is it Constitutional; and 3) Is it right?
He believes it is very important to not just legislate because you "think" something is right, but because you truly believe it is right, based on the Constitution, and doesn't harm the inherent rights of other people.

To come up with the best course of action, his process involves the need to answer these four questions:
1. What is the problem?
2. What goal are we trying to accomplish?
3. What options do we have to achieve that goal?
4. How feasible are each of the options?

According to Dr. Terry, "I believe that my principles and my logical process for dealing with issues combined with my passion will not only lead me to the correct decisions, but provide me with the tools to work with legislators and constituents in order to find solutions that work best for Tennesseans."


The Issues

Here are his views on some issues that few other candidates are addressing (based on my questionnaire). For other issues like gun rights and taxes, please visit his website.

TCA-5-8-301 allows for local governments to invest surplus revenue. In the case of Rutherford County, this money amounts to well over $10 million and earns fractions of a percent in interest. All the while, the County pays multiple percentage points in interest payments on the debt. Moreover the maturity date for the investments don't coincide with the budgeting process, effectively making this ever growing pile of money impossible to use. Statewide, similar examples can be found and the total amount of invested money is in excess of $1 billion. Governments should not tax us only to perpetually invest the money while raising taxes. I asked Dr. Terry his thoughts on changing the law to make it easier for local governments to withdraw these funds in lieu of raising taxes.

  • The premise of the question is that Rutherford County invests funds in low interest vehicles that could or should be used in the budgeting process; yet barriers exist in accessing these funds.  Thus, local governments are raising taxes as opposed to using the invested funds.  As with any bill, I would have to sit down and look at it through a process that determines possible consequences of any action or inaction.  On the surface, though, the analogy is one of an individual investing in a low yield CD for a year.  Then that same individual uses a high interest credit card to purchase certain items instead of accessing the money tied up in the CD.  Assuming that is the case, I would definitely think that we should look at solutions that would rectify that situation.

His views on the role of Federal & State governments:

  • I believe that Tennessee is one of fifty sovereign states as opposed to one of fifty federal districts.  As the Tenth Amendment reads, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.”  I believe in the individual, in personal responsibility and in the creativity and productivity that goes along with competition.  The further you get away from that, the more group think you get and the less individuality and creative spirit you achieve. 
  • I like to draw the simple analogy of the relationship of the states and federal government to that of schools.  Within schools, you have cliques, clubs and individuals.  The school should protect the individual rights and clubs, and encourage innovation; yet, provide for a safe environment.  However, the school shouldn't be in the business of requiring everyone to conform to one club or clique.  

How does Obamacare affect local doctors and what are some steps, if any, Tennessee could take to mitigate those problems?

  • I refer to Obamacare and other regulatory burdens placed on the medical field as the “Headache to Health Care Imbalance”. As the government intrudes more and more in the patient-physician relationship, there are more speed bumps to health care.  Doctors are spending more time and money dealing with issues that are not direct patient care.  So, doctors have more headaches to deal with in order to deliver health care.  Patients, on the other side, are going to have less access and less time face to face with a physician.  Patients will see their headaches to health care ratio rise.
  • The first step for Tennesseans is understanding that the patient-physician relationship is the cornerstone of health care and we must work to remove barriers to that relationship.  Another step would be to help elect candidates at the local, state and federal level that will work to mend our broken system.  On a local level, St. Thomas Rutherford Hospital will be starting residency programs in Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine.  This is a huge step in helping patients in Rutherford county deal with health care access issues.

If you could pick one single and specific issue that you would most want to accomplish, what would it be? 

  • For me, there are several issues or causes that I would like to address, but the goal I most hope to accomplish is self governance.  I see and hear the frustration from voters with the political process and with politicians.  People are sick and tired of good old boy politics.  People are tired of elected officials abusing their power.  There is a lot of disappointment with elected officials and it leads to apathy and a sense of helplessness on the part of voters.

The 48th district has a population of over 75,000. If elected, how do you plan on staying in touch with your constituents?

  • With the advent of social media, I think that it is getting easier and easier to reach constituents.  I get weekly and sometimes daily updates from Diane Black, Marsha Blackburn and Joe Carr.  Congressman Justin Amash of Michigan does a fantastic job of reaching constituents using social media including providing updates and reasons for how he voted.  There is software that will allow elected officials interact with their constituents.  I would explore the option of using that kind of software to interact with constituents. 
  • To my knowledge, I am the only candidate that has given out my personal cell phone number.  I am available to talk right now.  As well as holding an open house, I have frequently held “Tuesday’s with Dr. Terry” at a local restaurant and talked to many constituents.  If elected, I would plan to either attend or hold many events for constituents to come and talk to me.


Campaign contact info:

Campaign website: www.TerryFor48.com

Contact E-mail:  TerryFor48@gmail.com

Phone number: 615-801-2999

Facebook page: Dr. Bryan Terry

Twitter: @TerryFor48


Sunday, June 29, 2014

2014 Voter's Guide & Candidate List

Here is a quick guide to the upcoming elections as well as a candidates list for the primaries and general election - 130 candidates in all!

Voting Dates

The State Primary & County General election is on Aug.7, however early voting starts July 18 and goes through Aug. 2. The General Election is on Nov. 4, with early voting being Oct. 15 and going to Oct. 30.

ID Laws

Tennessee does have voter ID laws which help to protect the integrity of our democratic system. To vote you need to bring at least one of these forms of identification (they may be current OR expired):
TN driver's license;
TN Dept. of Safety photo ID;
TN gun carry permit with photo;
US military photo ID;
US passport;
Or, any other photo ID issued by the federal or Tennessee state government.

There are exemptions to this requirement:
If you are an absentee voter;
If you live in a nursing home or assisted living facility and vote at the facility;
If you are hospitalized at the time of voting;
If you have a religious objection to being photographed;
Or, if you are indigent and unable to obtain a photo ID without paying a fee (non-driving photo IDs cost $9.50 and are valid for 5 years).

You can obtain a free photo ID for the purposes of voting by visiting any county DMV or by calling 1-866-849-3548.
For additional election information you can call the TN Division of Elections at 1-877-850-4949.

Candidate List for the Aug. 7, 2014 Election
If available, I've linked each candidate's name with their campaign website or campaign Facebook page so you can learn more about them.

Primary Election Candidates
Governor:
Mark "Coonrippy" Brown (R)                              Charles V. Brown (D)
Bill Haslam (R)                                                Kennedy S. Johnson (D)
Basil Marceaux, Sr. (R)                                   William H. "John" McKamey (D)
Donald R. McFolin (R)                                      Ron Noonan (D)

US Senate:
Christian Agnew (R)                                       Terry Adams (D)
Lamar Alexander (R)                                      Gordon Ball (D)
Joe Carr (R)                                                   Larry Crim (D)
George S. Flinn (R)                                        Gary G. Davis (D)
John D. King (R)
Brenda S. Lenard (R)
Erin K. Magee (R)

US House of Representatives Dist. 4:
John Anderson (R)                                          Lenda Sherrell (D)
Scott DesJarlais (R)
Oluyomi "Fapas" Faparusi, Sr. (R)
Steve Lane (R)
David R. Tate (R)
Jim Tracy (R)
Michael S. Warden (R)

Tennessee State Senate Dist. 13Bill Ketron (R)

Tennessee State House of Representatives 
Dist. 34:
Rick Womick (R)

Dist. 37:
Eddie Smotherman (R)
Dawn White (R)

Dist. 48:
Adam Coggin (R)                           William B. Campbell (D)
Rick Peppers (R)
Bryan Terry (R)

Dist: 49:
Mike Sparks (R)                            Mike Williams (D)
Robert Stevens (R)

Republican State Executive Committee (you may vote for one male candidate and one female candidate in your district)
Dist. 13 Committeeman: Tim Rudd    or    James Gann (write-in candidate)

Dist. 13 Committeewoman: Kelsey C. Ketron    or    Mishelle P. Perkins

Dist. 14 Committeeman: Lance Frizzell    or    Jim Sandman

Dist. 14 Committeewoman: Lynne Davis    or    JoAnne Skidmore

Democrat State Executive Committee (you may vote for one male candidate and one female candidate in your district)
Dist. 13 Committeeman: Darrell Bouldin    or    Tommy Bragg

Dist. 13 Committeewoman: Mary A. Eckels    or    Kimberli R. Jensen

Dist. 14 Committeeman: Mark F. Farrar

Dist. 14 Committeewoman: Brenda Abels    or    Joan G. Hill


County General Election

Circuit Court Judge Division I - 16th Judicial District: Jeffrey L. Peach (R)    or   Mark Rogers (I)

Circuit Court Judge Division II - 16th Judicial District: Nathan Nichols (R)   or    David Bragg (I)

Circuit Court Judge Division III - 16th Judicial District: Keith Siskin (R)

Circuit Court Judge Division IV - 16th Judicial District: Royce Taylor (I)

Chancellor - 16th Judicial District: Howard W. Wilson (R)

District Attorney General - 16th Judicial District: Jennings H. Jones (R)

Public Defender - 16th Judicial District: Gerald L. Melton (R)

General Sessions Judge - Part I: Kevin Hodges (R)   or   Ben H. McFarlin, Jr. (I)

General Sessions Judge - Part II: Barry Tidwell (R)   or   David Loughry (I)

General Sessions Judge - Part III: Toby Gilley (R)   or   Larry D. Brandon (D)

Juvenile Court Judge: Donna S. Davenport (R)

Sheriff:
Robert Arnold (R)
Bill Kennedy (D)
Dale Armour (I)
Jim R. Tramel (I)

Rutherford County Mayor: 
Ernest G. Burgess (R)
Heather A. Brown (I)
Teresa St. Clair (I)

County Commission
Dist. 1:                                                 Dist. 2:
Doug Shafer (R)                                    Steve Pearcy (R)

Dist. 3:                                                 Dist. 4:
Will P. Jordan (R)                                 Jon D. Jaques (R)
                                                           Jon Frazier (I)
                                                           Robert Peay (I)

Dist. 5:                                                 Dist. 6:
Carol Cook (R)                                     Joe F. Jernigan (R)

Dist 7:                                                  Dist. 8:
Michael D. Kusch (R)                            Edward Phillips (R)
                                                           Pettus L. Read (I)
                                                           Steve Spence (I)

Dist. 9:                                                 Dist. 10:
Joe A. Gourley (R)                                Brad Turner (R)

Dist. 11:                                               Dist. 12:
Rhonda Allen (R)                                  Robert Stevens (R)

Dist. 13:                                              Dist. 14:
Paul Johnson (R)                                 Charles Baum
Chris Deal (I)                                       Tony B. Gains (I)

Dist. 15:                                               Dist. 16:
David Nipper (R)                                   Phillip S. Dodd (R)
Tim Roediger (I)

Dist. 17:                                              Dist. 18:
Jeff Phillips (R)                                    Allen Mcadoo (R)

Dist. 19:                                              Dist. 20:
Shawn Kaplan (R)                                Trey Gooch (R)

Dist. 21:
Patsy L. Briley (R)
Chantho Sourinho (D)

County Trustee: Teb Batey

Circuit Court Clerk: Melissa Harrell (R)   or   Avent Lane (D)

County Clerk: Lisa D. Crowell  or   Pierrecia Lyons (D)

Register of Deeds: Heather Dawbarn

Rutherford County Road Board (non-partisan)
Zone 1: David Victory
Zone 2: Keith Bratcher
Zones 4: Dick Steagall

Rutherford County School Board (non-partisan)
Zone 3:
Veronica Buchanan
Howard Jones
Lisa W. Moore

Zone 4:
Wayne R. Blair
Eric Tuttobene

Zone 7:
Jody L. Bond
James C. Estes
Gabriel Fancher
Patrick McCarthy
Paul L. Peavy

Smyrna, Town Court Judge (non-partisan)
Lynn E. Alexander
Keta J. Barnes 
Jeremy Gourley
Cherie W. Meece
W. Alan Rose

Smyrna, Town Court Clerk (non-partisan)
Terry D. Davenport
Lisa K. R. Wagner



For more information please visit the Rutherford County Election Commission's website at http://www.rutherfordcountytn.gov/election/index.htm

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Featuring City Council Candidate Jeff Rainwater

City Council Candidate Jeff Rainwater has provided his answers and thoughts on the questions I feel are the most pressing for this upcoming election. The first question also serves as an introduction to the candidate and it is followed by 9 additional issue specific questions. 

Thanks for taking part Jeff!
Don't forget, City elections are on April 15, 2014 and early voting begins March 26!





What is it that sets you apart from other candidates?

  • I believe my 17 years of corporate financial planning and budgeting in the healthcare industry gives me a unique skill set to tackle the fiscal issues facing the City along with being about to make the hard decision required of a Council member. The second trait that will make me successful as a council member is the passion I have for the way of life in Murfreesboro. Serving the people of Murfreesboro is a great way I can have an impact on the future of our city.


Do you support expanding or abolishing the automated red light camera program and why?

  • I believe we should abolish red light cameras. This is a privacy intrusion that should never be allowed.  Privacy is very important to me.


Currently the City is $241 million in debt (excluding retirement liabilities etc.) and we add between $25-50 million in new debt each year. How to do you propose addressing this issue?

  • A one-year moratorium on new debt would be a good start. This would allow us to retire debt without adding new. We should then entertain the idea of a required referendum for any debt issuance. Other ways to reduce borrowing would be privatization of parks, looking for alternative revenue streams from public transportation through advertising and sponsorships. We are projected to have $31M in debt service in FY2014. That more than it costs to build a city school.  I’m not completely opposed to using debt to finance items such as schools or roads, but our current Council has taking borrowing an extreme.


On top of the debt, for the past two years, the City has operated with a deficit of around $4.9 million/year. Would you support or oppose a requirement that each future budget be balanced; that is to say, deficits will not be allowed except perhaps for extraordinary circumstances?

  • We should require a balanced budget with the exception of allowing borrowing for school and road construction. Everything else including park and recreation should be funded through current year tax revenue. If we can’t afford it, we shouldn't build it. After a couple years of fiscal responsibility we should entertain a tax cut.


The City receives millions in state and federal grants each year for our schools. It is a well-established fact that under current conditions the City cannot build new schools without large amounts of grants, loans, and additional debt. Do you feel this is acceptable and what could we do to put us in a position to better pay for new schools?

  • In a growing city, using debt for school building may not be avoidable. However, we should be in a financial position to pay them off in 10 years. This would keep our total debt load at a minimum. If we keep debt low, we could fund more school building from current year taxes. There is a stream of revenue from property taxes on the new dwellings to service the construction debt.


In 2013, the City approved a 25-year “MasterPlan” to expand the Greenway system well beyond City limits. To achieve this, the City will engage in widespread eminent domain. Is the use of eminent domain an appropriate use of government force for the building of recreational facilities?

  • Unless the City is ready to purchase land and build the greenway, the plans should be so general that they can’t be tied to any single property. Eminent domain should never be used for a park or greenway. What the City has done with this 25-year plan is harm property values in the area they have identified for a greenway without compensation to the landowners. If you own land that has a line on a map drawn through it for a greenway, you have lost value without any compensation because the intentions of the City are part of public record. This type reckless behavior needs to stop now. This ridiculous spending will never happen, but the landowners who are perceived to be in the way are harmed. The City Council should be ashamed of what they have done here.


The City spends around $13 million each year on parks, recreational facilities, and golf courses. This makes recreation the 3rd largest budget item for the entire City government. The City also spends hundreds of thousands, split between two departments, simply to manage Civic Plaza and the parking garage. Cities across the nation, like Sandy Springs, Georgia, have begun privatizing non-essential services or entering into private-public partnerships in an attempt to save tax payer’s money and increase the quality of the services provided. 

Do you think we should take a serious look at finding new ways to do business, like privatizing a limited number of services, or do think that we should continue along our current path?

  • Privatization of Parks and Rec has been part of my platform from the beginning. Bryant Park in NY is a great example. If we carefully privatize our parks we could expand the system to all areas of town without use of taxpayer money. Other areas I have advocated for privatization are Solid Waste and Public Transportation. I have a recycling service that runs a much less dense route with the same type trucks and still makes a profit. It is obvious this would be an area we could study for privatization. Public Transportation usually takes a partnership, but we should have alternative revenue from advertising. 
  • Our Golf Operations should be leased to a company that is willing to take full risk for running these courses. The city should not be in the golf business. The same is true disk golf and tennis. There are times when making land in parks available for these type leases are necessary to facilitate the development of these facilities, but the city doesn't have to be on the hook financially.


Murfreesboro has grown at an astounding rate over the past few decades. Would you be in favor of implementing district representation for Council seats?

  • District representation is the number one issue that needs to be solved now. I live in Blackman, that has absolutely no representation. It is obvious with the way the City has treated the citizens in the Blackman Community with recent rezoning. Every citizen deserves to have a champion on the council from his or her area. Six out of 7 of our council members live with about 1.5 miles of each other. This is completely unacceptable. We need to next council to act to rectify this wrong. They should stand strong and not pass the buck until the 2016 elections to make the decision. That would just perpetuate the problems our at large system creates. District representation creates a natural check and balance between Council members.


Currently, citizens are only permitted to voice their concerns directly and personally to the full City Council during public hearings, and only if their concerns are related to the subject of the hearing. Do you support or oppose opening up a portion of each Council meeting to the general public to allow citizens to address the Council for any concern they may have?

  • I have voiced this with the Council many times. I have even used public hearings about unrelated items to get my voice heard. We should not be treated this way. Every resolution should have public hearing along with a general public hearing at the beginning of each meeting. The more public input the better.


What are your thoughts on entering into a “metro” form of government with the County?

  • Absolutely not. Metro governments usually become to large to effectively influence as a citizen. I don’t want a situation where northern Rutherford County could tell Murfreesboro what to do. The opposite wouldn't be fair to Smyrna or LaVergne. Even though in a perfect world a metro government could leave to efficiency, the distance it puts between the citizen and their government can be detrimental.


Candidate contact information:

Campaign website:  www.voterainwater.org 
Contact E-mail:  VoteRainwater@comcast.net
Phone number:  615-796-6860
Facebook page:  facebook.com/voterainwater
Twitter:   @voterainwater

Sunday, January 19, 2014

City Council: Axl David and Brian Patterson

The first two City Council candidates to be featured are Axl David and Brian Patterson.

Each candidate has provided their answers and thoughts on the questions I feel are the most pressing for this upcoming election. The first question also serves as an introduction to each candidate and it is followed by 9 additional issue specific questions.

Don't forget, City elections are April 15, 2014!

Axl David

Introductory question: What is it that sets you apart from other candidates?

I am truly a people’s candidate with no conflicts of interest whatsoever. I have no interest in running for higher office, and like my campaign motto, I want to be “Your Voice in the ‘Boro“. I understand the role of a City Councilman is to represent the residents and city employees, not outside interests. I was raised in the country and I take a common sense approach to governing.


Brian Patterson

1. Introductory question: What is it that sets you apart from other candidates?

I feel I am a well-rounded candidate with no conflicts of interests.  As a husband, father, and small business owner I have a vested interest in making sure our City remains a great place to raise a family and make a living, but I am not beholden to any specific industry or special interest group.
My goal is to be the most accessible candidate in this race and, if elected, the most accessible member of the city council.  I will not forget who I work for and my first responsibility, to serve the taxpayers.

Questionnaire

2. Do you support expanding or abolishing the automated red light camera program and why?

Axl David: I would do whatever it takes to immediately end the city’s unsafe, unethical, and unconstitutional photo enforcement program. Along with that, I would work with the city’s Streets Division to explore solutions that actually reduce red light running; such as strobes in the red lights, amber beacons to warn of an upcoming signal, speed breakers, speed tables, etc. Conversion of intersections to roundabouts almost completely eliminates fatal accidents (source: U.S. Federal Highway Administration).
One simple, cheap, and effective solution is to add black backplates to the signals so that they’re not “lost” in the sky. These are present at a lot of signals in Murfreesboro, but not at the signals at photo enforced intersections. According to the Michigan Department of Transportation, daytime visibility is increased by a staggering 33% when black back-plates are installed.

Brian Patterson: I fully support abolishing the red light camera program for two primary reasons. One, it is effectively removing millions of dollars out of our local economy and transferring the bulk of those funds to a company based in Arizona. I want to keep those dollars here in Murfreesboro. Second, I have yet to see any data that conclusively proves they are making us safer. The City’s own data doesn't prove it.
In November of 2014, the City will vote to renew its contract with American Traffic Solutions. If I am elected, I will vote NO on that extension.


3. Currently the City is $241 million in debt (excluding retirement liabilities etc.) and we add between $25-50 million in new debt each year. How to do you propose addressing this issue?

Axl David: The first and obvious step is to reduce non-essential spending. It is unacceptable that Parks and Recreation continue to dominate the city’s budget, while we need to go further in debt to pay for basics such as schools and police. In my opinion, the city’s leadership is not properly prioritizing their spending.
One solution I feel strongly about is privatization of non-essential services, as long as it can happen without laying off city employees. Recently, in Lawrence, Indiana, the city began contracting out their trash collection department. The company contracted by the city hired every employee that worked for the city‘s trash collection department, doubled the salary of half the employees, and significantly increased their benefits package. 
The best part is the company charges the city hundreds of thousands of dollars less than the city spent on trash collection. Private businesses operate better and more efficiently than government.

Brian Patterson: First of all, I am eager to see the latest CAFR report (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) in order to get a definitive answer on the current status of our UAALs (Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liabilities). I have received conflicting information on what that amount is, so it’s difficult to answer with complete confidence. Whatever the amount is will determine how aggressively we should cut spending in order to deal with our debt and liabilities.
Assuming that the UAALs don’t pose an immediate threat, we can reign in spending in a few ways. First, we must do a better job of prioritizing spending. We don’t need to be building $23 million parks, $105 million Greenway extensions, or $3 million tennis courts while we are a quarter of a billion dollars in debt. (All of those things we are currently committed to undertake). I don’t mean to pick on Parks and Rec, but that department is currently our fourth largest annual expense, and is on pace to overtake our Fire Department as the third largest budget item. We must remember, parks are a luxury item, and they should be prioritized as such.
Second, I would like to see us incentivize savings within our City staff. We should be offering performance bonuses for department heads who are able to come in under their projected budgets. Bonuses could be distributed by those department heads to their staff as they see fit. This could provide a two-fold benefit, monetary savings as well as providing a tangible criteria for the, often debated, performance based raises for City employees.
Third, I feel it’s time we explore the possibility of privatizing some of our services. If we allow private businesses, as well as city employees, to bid on contracts for some of our non-essential services, I am confident we can find some savings. Again, I am not opposed to city operated services, but by introducing a competitive bidding process, we can undoubtedly increase efficiency and lower costs.


4. On top of the debt, for the past two years, the City has operated with a deficit of around $4.9 million/year. Would you support or oppose a requirement that each future budget be balanced; that is to say, deficits will not be allowed except perhaps for extraordinary circumstances?

Axl David: With our current debt approaching $250 million, any deficit spending is unacceptable. I would support a requirement that future budgets be balanced, with reducing our debt being a priority.

Brian Patterson: Assuming “extraordinary circumstances” could be defined adequately, yes I would. Anytime we consider measures such as this, we are forced to acknowledge a “never-say-never” possibility. With that in mind, I would have to be satisfied that the “extraordinary circumstances” would provide us with the flexibility needed to deal with a real crisis. I would never want to put our City in position to be hurt by rigid bureaucracy.


5. The City receives millions in state and federal grants each year for our schools. It is a well-established fact that under current conditions the City cannot build new schools without large amounts of grants, loans, and additional debt. Do you feel this is acceptable and what could we do to put us in a position to better pay for new schools?

Axl David: Of course I don’t feel it’s ideal for the City to borrow money. Unfortunately with schools, there are so many factors far outside of the City’s control. Borrowing, and accepting grants, for schools in today’s climate are often a necessary and uncontrollable evil.
The City could mitigate some of the damage by prioritizing the Murfreesboro City Schools budget over departments such as Parks and Recreation, and working with the elected school board members. 

Brian Patterson: Again, prioritizing spending would be a great place to start. Most everyone would agree that schools should be a higher priority than Parks and Rec, yet in FY2013 Murfreesboro spent over twice as much on its P&R department than on its own schools. Based on our projected growth, new school construction will be an ongoing need. Knowing that, we would be wise to budget accordingly. I don’t want to see us dependent on state and federal funds for our own schools, as those funds often come with “strings attached”.


6. In 2013, the City approved a 25-year “Master Plan” to expand the Greenway system well beyond City limits. To achieve this, the City will engage in wide-spread eminent domain. Is the use of eminent domain an appropriate use of government force for the building of recreational facilities?

Axl David: I believe the Master Plan was designed assuming that the City will have annexed most of the land within the Urban Growth Boundary within 25 years. Eminent domain for any reason, especially for recreational purposes, is unacceptable and I adamantly oppose it.
Master Plans, by design, are often planned assuming the best case scenario lasting for the next 25-100 years. They are often lofty because of negative externalities anticipated; such as a recession, population loss, etc. It is important to note that Master Plans are not legally binding in any way and City officials should be flexible as economic conditions dictate.

Brian Patterson: Absolutely not. Recreational facilities are luxury items. Private property rights should not be violated for such non-essential projects. Eminent domain was intended to be used in limited circumstances for critical infrastructure. If elected, I will passionately defend property rights. In my view, the concept of private property is fundamental to the American way of life.


7. The City spends around $13 million each year on parks, recreational facilities, and golf courses. This makes recreation the 3rd largest budget item for the entire City government. The City also spends hundreds of thousands, split between two departments, simply to manage Civic Plaza and the parking garage. Cities across the nation, like Sandy Springs, Georgia, have begun privatizing non-essential services or entering into private-public partnerships in an attempt to save tax payer’s money and increase the quality of the services provided. Do you think we should take a serious look at finding new ways to do business, like privatizing a limited number of services, or do think that we should continue along our current path?

Axl David: As explained earlier, I do believe in privatizing some non-essential city services, only if it can be accomplished without laying off city employees.
Sandy Springs, Georgia is an affluent bedroom community to Atlanta, with a median income average almost twice that of Murfreesboro. Although it could be a model for some privatization of non-essential services, there are significant differences between the cities that should be taken into consideration. 

Brian Patterson: As I stated in a previous answer, I do think it’s time we begin a bidding process for city services. I want to emphasize that I want to see the City’s current departments get the opportunity to enter bids along with private businesses. Competition is a good thing, and it is the best way to make services more efficient and lower the cost to taxpayers. 
One thing to note in the Sandy Springs, GA comparison, that city was basically starting from scratch in building its governance. Obviously, we are in a different situation, so I think the best way to approach it would be to systematically work our way up the ladder from smaller services to larger ones. This would allow us to experiment with the process, and provide quantitative feedback on its effectiveness.


8. Murfreesboro has grown at an astounding rate over the past few decades. Would you be in favor of implementing district representation for Council seats?

Axl David: I believe in a mixed-system with district representation, while still maintaining some at-large seats. Murfreesboro has grown at an astronomical rate, and has maintained a lot of diversity with several unique neighborhoods. A city as large and diverse as Murfreesboro needs district representation.
One downfall of district representation is there tends to be more tension and vote-trading among representatives of different districts. This is why I believe there should still be limited at-large representation.

Brian Patterson: Yes. I think it is time for a hybrid system of district seats and at large seats. We are blessed to live in a dynamic city that has enjoyed tremendous growth over the past decade, both in population and in commercial development.  Because of this, different parts of our city now face diverse needs and challenges. Certain parts of the city might be facing traffic issues and re-zoning efforts. While others may be struggling with a higher crime rate and a lack of sidewalks. All of these concerns are valid and should be addressed by city government. These areas need representation from their own neighborhoods.  
It stands to reason, our City Council should be made up of representatives from different parts of the city. This is how government is structured at the county, state, and federal levels. It is a fundamental part of a representative democracy. Unfortunately, as it stands now, all Council seats are elected “at large”. While that may have been effective when our town had a population of 30,000 people, it is certainly not the best way to represent a city of over 110,000.
Amending our city charter to mandate district representation is vital to assuring that the people of Murfreesboro get the representation they deserve.


9. Currently, citizens are only permitted to voice their concerns directly and personally to the full City Council during public hearings, and only if their concerns are related to the subject of the hearing. Do you support or oppose opening up a portion of each Council meeting to the general public to allow citizens to address the Council for any concern they may have? 

Axl David: The first time I went to a Murfreesboro City Council meeting, I had intended to use the Public Forum to address my concerns with the City’s red light camera program. I left shocked that the City does not allow this, as it is commonplace at nearly every city and county meeting in the country. Refusing to listen to the citizens is anathema to a functional elected body. 
I fully support having a Public Forum at the council meetings because the very foundation of an elected City Council is to listen and represent the citizens. The City should also arrange a way for residents to submit recorded statements if they are unable to attend City Council meetings due to a disability or other extenuating circumstances.

Brian Patterson: Yes! The first job of a council member, is to serve the taxpayer. In essence, it is an employer/employee relationship. With that in mind, how can a council member justify not allowing their boss to address them? I would love to see a public comment section at the end of every council meeting. It should be open-ended, with each speaker allowed three minutes to address the council.  


10. What are your thoughts on entering into a “metro” form of government with the County?

Axl David: I oppose any kind of consolidated city-county government with Murfreesboro or Rutherford County. I have heard no compelling evidence that this type of arrangement is beneficial or desired by residents either within the city limits or in the rural areas of the county.

Brian Patterson: I am against it. I've heard the “efficiency” argument from advocates of metro, and I understand their views. The problem is, larger governments never operate more efficiently. Whatever administrative costs they initially save, they more than squander in bloated bureaucracy as time progresses. I firmly believe that the more local the government, the better.

Below, is the contact information each candidate has provided.

Axl David:
Campaign website: http://www.ElectAxl.com 
Contact E-mail: ded3b@mtmail.mtsu.edu 
Phone number: (615) 442-6767


Brian Patterson:
Campaign website:  BrianforMurfreesboro.com
Contact E-mail:  Brian@BrianforMurfreesboro.com
Phone number: (615)533-6641
Twitter: @BPintheboro