Showing posts with label Murfreesboro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Murfreesboro. Show all posts

Monday, October 24, 2016

Laura Bohling for Dist. 34 Shares Her Thoughts

Laura Bohling, Democrat candidate for State House District 34 and former Rutherford County Circuit Court Clerk, took the time to share her story and ideas with Murfreesboro Review. I reached out to her Republican opponent, Tim Rudd, but he has yet to respond.

Remember, early voting has already begun and runs until November 3. Election day is on November 8.

Laura Bohling campaign photo.
(October 22, 2016)

     One comment or question that comes up occasionally is: “Weren’t you a Republican?” or even, “Weren’t you a Tea Party Republican?” For the record, I was a founding member of Campaign for Liberty in Rutherford County – definitely NOT the Tea Party. I leaned to the right because culturally that is where I thought I was supposed to be, but I was never Tea Party. I have always been anti-war (but patently not anti-military) so a libertarian lean in the Republican world worked for me.

     As Circuit Court Clerk (2010-2014), I tried very hard to change the way things worked both in the office and the courtroom like creating job descriptions and performance evaluations, instituting a Collections Department that collected over $2 million of past fines and fees, and working on developing a new computer system. That computer system was ready to go before I left office, but the newly elected clerk did not want it installed until she took office. I offered help through various means – phone call, text, email, friends, business associates, even publically stating I would help in the DNJ – but no help was sought. Of course, as is required in the transfer of officials in a Tennessee Constitutional Office, I left my successor with absolutely clean books – all items able to be paid were, and each court I was responsible for (General Sessions Criminal, General Sessions Civil, Circuit Civil, Circuit Criminal and Juvenile) were balanced to zero and all excess fees turned over to the County.

     One thing I didn't do well was play the political game. I didn't give in to the Rutherford County political machine, and that meant my re-election was practically impossible. As I served, I realized the Republican supermajority was only interested in maintaining their power, not actually helping people. When I lost re-election in a three-way GOP primary, I continued a journey to my roots that started four years before. Some have claimed, “When you lost your re-election, you jumped ship and blamed the Republicans.” Hardly, I actually actively participated in the development of the Republican Liberty Caucus in the County and the State, serving on both boards after my loss. When my son came out as gay in November 2014, the journey accelerated. I could no longer associate with a party that actively works against my son and people like him.

     I was raised in a union home, my dad a steelworker and my mom a UFCW member. My first job – the same grocery store chain as my mom. I remember watching my proud dad battle depression after the steel mills shut down. I wondered how far I'd come from that upbringing to be associated with whom I was with now. To be clear, I have wonderful friends who are conservative, Republican, and Libertarian, but the political elites of the GOP don't care about improving people's lives, just spouting talking points and winning elections. I realized that the only place I felt comfortable was at home, returning to my roots as a Democrat. As a candidate for District 34 State Representative, I'm making pledges to show my commitment to the people, not the power. First, I won't take per diems like many of our local delegation do. Second, I won't take the state insurance. This is not a daytime job, this is an opportunity to serve the 62,000 that live in District 34 whether they vote for me or not.

     As I've talked to folks across the district I've learned that the important things are constant regardless of our political parties: bringing better-paying jobs here to Rutherford County so we don't have to travel to Nashville or Franklin to find them; improving our infrastructure through efficient, bipartisan solutions to cut down on congestion and get ahead of our population growth and working to move broadband expansion out of committee; fully funding our education budget that is $500 million short and reducing the burden on counties and localities; and passing Governor Haslam's plan Insure Tennessee.

     Many folks are frustrated by the insurance situation in our state – I am too! – but what they don't know is that these problems are directly related to our legislature stubbornly ignoring their responsibility to pass InsureTN. Yes! I said responsibility! $2.5 billion is sitting in Washington because our legislature won't do the right thing. Their inaction means that 7 rural hospitals have closed, eliminating hundreds of jobs and literally putting people's lives at risk because of politics. InsureTN has a required second-year review and a partnership with state hospital systems presents a budget neutral option that provides insurance for 280,000 Tennesseans (as well as 24,000 veterans) in the gap, gives our State Insurance Commissioner a negotiating position not currently available, and provides an average insurance savings of $1,000 per family per year.

     The choice on November 8th is clear. My opponent is a thirty-year political operative who's worked on campaigns for Rick Womick and Robert Arnold, making sure they got elected without regard for how they would govern. He will assuredly do nothing without first consulting his Republican leaders … because he's actually said as much in print. He'll take no position that isn't politically expedient and beneficial to his ability to maintain power. He is the antithesis of what any voter would want because he would be a fear-mongering, do-nothing representative.

     You can vote for me. We may not agree on all the issues – in fact, I guarantee we won't. What you will know is that I'll have carefully studied all sides of an issue; listened to all the people I can from all perspectives. You'll know that in the end the decision I've made is one that will benefit the most of the 62,000 people who live here in District 34. This is not another step on a political ladder and I definitely don’t play political games. This is an opportunity to serve the people of Rutherford County – to really make a difference.

     Folks, it's time for a change. It's time for Common Sense Leadership to be what we expect on a daily basis from our District 34 representative. I would be honored to have your trusted and deeply valued vote. Please consider me, Laura Bohling, as your next District 34 state representative. I pledge that I will represent us with integrity, with poise, and with logic from day one.

Remember. Laura Bohling. November 8th! Thank you so much.


Contact Information

Website: www.LauraBohling.com
Phone number: 615-625-6191
Facebook: Facebook.com/LauraBohling4District34
Twitter: Twitter.com/LauraBaMom

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Guest Article - The 2nd Amendment in Parks and on Greenways

On August 21, 2014 the Murfreesboro City council debated a motion to instruct the City Attorney to create a resolution to allow Handgun Carry Permit Holders to legally carry on the Greenways System.  The Council voted 5-2 to deny the resolution from being written.  Toby Gilley and Eddie Smotherman were the only two Council members who voted to allow this resolution to be written. Keep in mind this vote was just to have a resolution written that could then be debated and brought to a vote on the merit of the resolution.

Mayor Shane McFarland, Vice Mayor Doug Young, and Council Member Rick LaLance all expressed concern that the input from the Greenway Projects Committee and the Parks and Recreation Commission was not solicited.  They used this as rational for voting against creating a resolution.  Neither Vice Mayor Young nor Councilman LaLance made any effort to offer a motion to instruct these groups to discuss this issue.  This was quite troubling because Councilman LaLance claimed to be a strong Second Amendment supporter during the last election.  The Mayor is not allowed to make a motion.  Council Member Madelyn Scales-Harris brought up concerns about safety to justify her no vote while Council Member Ron Washington used the excuse that he was not a “gun person” to vote no.

If Mayor McFarland, Vice Mayor Young and Councilman LaLance want to send this “through committee” before voting on the merit, let’s push them to instruct this commission and committee to formulate an opinion and deliver it to the City Council within 30 days. We should not let them hid behind a process to avoid voting on the merit of our Second Amendment Rights in our parks and greenways.  The council holds “open mic” for public comments at 6:30 PM in council chambers at the first meeting of each month. The next one is on September 4, 2014. (note: this meeting has been canceled)  If you are passionate about your Second Amendment rights, join me to demand the City Council proceed with restoring this right to the citizens.   We need to demand our rights not only on the Greenway System, but in our parks as well.  Yes, OUR parks.  If you do not want to speak, just show up to demonstrate your support of the Second Amendment.  Before then, please email and call all the Council members and let them know how you feel.  Let them know how important our rights are in this case.  The contact information is available at the city’s website, Murfreesborotn.gov

This is a unique opportunity to influence the restoration of our Second Amendment rights.  We need to stress to the Council that the Second Amendment has two parts.  We have the right to keep AND the right to bear arms.  It also states that these rights “shall not be infringed.”  We need to demand our local elected officers adhere to our Constitution.  To solidify this right, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision stating the Second Amendment is an individual right (DC v. Heller, 2008).  Many anti-gun cities and states ignored this ruling.  This lead the Supreme Court to clarify with McDonald v. Chicago (2010) that state and local government cannot infringe upon the rights in the Second Amendment.  Apparently, that word hasn't made its way to the Murfreesboro City Council Chambers.  Let us make sure they hear it loud and clear.

While it is well established that we should have the right to bear arms in a public place, the quickest way for us to stop the City of Murfreesboro from trampling on our rights is to speak out at a council meeting with many attendees.  We all know the safety issues are just fear mongering.  Let’s demand the City Council vote on whether they believe in the Second Amendment.  We also need to vote accordingly in the next election.

When we next vote for city council, the Second Amendment issue gives you a look into whether that Council Member believes in freedom.  Please use this as part of your voting decision.  When we vote in November to replace Councilman Gilley, I cannot stress how import due diligence is before voting.  Contact the candidate and get a statement about the Second Amendment.  If they try to ride the fence, vote for someone else.

Again please join me to speak to the City Council about our Second Amendment rights on September 4, 2014 at 6:30 PM in council chambers. (note: this meeting has been canceled If the meeting is postponed for any reason, the “open mic” will take place at the next meeting.  Council meetings are every Thursday.  Don’t forget to email and call all the members of the council.

Jeff Rainwater

Friday, July 18, 2014

Principles, Power, and Precincts - Part III

---This is Part III of a three part series, here's Part I and Part II---

Here is the third and final part to Bruce Cavender's series "Principles, Power, and Precincts". In this article we learn about the precinct process itself and how it can be a powerful tool for reclaiming our communities. The key to solving the problems facing us is become educated and active, only then can anything of real substance be done. For far too long those who have been active (thus "in charge" by default) have been those who only want power for power's sake or to appease special interests at the expense of everyone else. We need every good man and woman to help reverse this, and the good news is, it doesn't a multitude or vast amounts of time. Feel free to contact Bruce or Jacob Bogle if you would like to become involved.


Part III, Precincts

Contrary to what you have been told, a small number of people really can make a difference. Read that sentence again and let it sink in. I have seen it. It is also clearly true that there are those that don't want you to get involved and make that difference. They want the power for themselves. They are self-serving, special interest tyrants. Let me give you an example tied to the Precinct Process.

Several years back, a teacher sent me a copy of a document she received from her union that not only admonished her to get involved in the Republican Precinct Process, but laid out in great detail how the process worked and how to become a part of it. They sunk some real resources to make this document.

Now think about that for a second.

Traditional Republican Principles stand for Free Markets, Individual Rights and Meritocracy in general. Unions clearly are not bastions of the free market principle of “price discovery” when it comes to the value of their members' hourly productivity or encouraging high individual performance. Just as Crapitalists damage our system, unions seek influence that benefit their own special interests … or, failing that, at least disrupt who they see as those opposing their desired ends. Either works for them.

A little after that, I spoke at another County's Party Meeting. When I asked to meet the Chairman, I saw several executive committee member roll their eyes. One person finally spoke up and said that the Chairman was a teacher (and union member) that said he had to work late that night and couldn't make the Party's meeting. Several nodded when one finally stood up and said, “He has done absolutely nothing and needs to go.”  I left there thinking just how much damage a single person can do to the morale and effectiveness of an organization. It also reinforced the point that people's driving principles need to be critically understood before electing them to positions in any Party or Government.

Whether you are electing the President of the United States or a Delegate to a local precinct, the quality of government you get out depends on the principles and degree of commitment of the elected.

Function

The Precinct Process is the method by which county members of a political party choose (a) the executive leaders of the party that will represent them (a convention) and (b) actually select party candidates for office in a Delegated Election (also known as a Caucus). 

A county party's executive committee deals mostly with internal activities, the state party, the local election commission, occasional media releases and local/state government officials to responsibly represent its county members. It is governed by State and County Bylaws as well as Robert's Rules of Order enforced by a parliamentarian. Usually this committee has fewer than 20 members.

Whether electing officials via a caucus or a new executive committee via a convention, the process of electing qualified delegates via 'Precinct Meetings' in the County is the same. The sitting executive committee sets a date, time and location for a delegate election in the precincts (Precinct Meetings) and give legal notice via local advertisement. If you don't read the classifieds each day, it is easy to miss entirely. It is up to you to get connected and in this loop. Go to a monthly party meeting or hook up with someone that is already knows the ropes. Be diligent. Scope out someone that is on the ball, tell them you are interested in volunteering and want to be involved in the party.  Be principled and professional, not adversarial. That will kill your chance to influence the process.  Find out what precinct you are in and ask how to contact your Precinct Captain.  If there is a captain in your area, call them and tell them you would like to be a delegate.  Your captain should welcome you, take your name and contact info for the upcoming Convention or Caucus. Make a note and check in with the party in case the captain doesn't execute. Write the date down and be diligent.  Conventions to elect party executives generally occur in the first quarter of odd numbered years, giving them a frequency of one every two years. 

If there is no current precinct captain in your area, volunteer to fill that space through appointment by the Party Chair. This is almost always welcome and very much appreciated by the Chair.

Despite the title, the Precinct Captain has no special authority or power. It is a position of leadership within the precinct that sees a wide range of participation.  Some captains only get involved for a very short amount of time for Convention or Caucus elections. Others take deep interests in political happenings in their local area and can spend as much time as they like on local issues.  It is a great way to meet lots of people, learn the game and move the process ahead.

Precinct Meetings

The first order of business at a Precinct Meeting to elect delegates for a Convention is to elect a captain to serve for the next two years, starting with electing delegates for the upcoming Convention. If the Precinct Meeting is for a Caucus and a Captain exists, the current captain simply proceeds to handle the  delegate election process. (Note: In some states, precinct delegates are elected via full primary elections. Rutherford County's parties do not function this way. In my humble opinion, this is good right now because Tennessee's “Open Primary” dissipates most differences between parties and choices for the electorate because Democrats crossing over into Republican primaries elect Republicans that are most like Democrats … and vice versa. This results in a mushy uni-Party that isn't responsive to voters. One has to ask, if 25% of people pulling a Republican Primary Ballot historically vote Democrat, is it still a Republican Primary?)

Each Precinct in Rutherford County is apportioned a number of delegates in accordance with the number of votes cast in that precinct during the last Presidential election. The Republican Party calls for one delegate to be elected to represent for each 200 votes cast.  For example, if 850 votes were cast in your precinct, four delegates would be elected for the first 800 votes and one more delegate would be added to represent the 50 votes over the prior 200 vote unit … or 5 delegates could be apportioned in the process to vote in the actual Convention or Delegated Election. Some precincts are small, some large. If the turnout is small in the general election and only 190 votes are cast in a precinct, only one delegate can be elected to the precinct process.  Some precincts will see well over 1,000 to 2,000 votes cast and could have 10 to 12 delegates elected.  It can vary, but on average, only six to seven delegate positions per precinct are available to be filled. If a precinct, qualifies for some number of delegates, it also qualifies for that same number of “alternates”.  Alternates do not vote in a Caucus or Convention unless the total number of delegates allowed is not met. Alternates regularly are called upon to step up because of sickness or other absence of elected delegates at the full Convention or Delegated Election.

After delegates and alternates are elected at Republican Precinct Meetings, the results are gathered and sent to the Contest and Credentials Committee.  The C&C committee checks each delegate and alternate to see if they are a registered voter in Rutherford County and a bona fide Republican in good standing.

Qualifications can be:

A. Any individual who is actively involved in the Tennessee Republican Party, his County Republican Party, or any of recognized auxiliary organizations of either; or

B. Any individual who has voted in at least two (2) of the four (4) most recent state and/or local Republican primary elections; or

C. Any individual who is vouched for to the satisfaction of the State Chairman as a bona fide Republican, such as by an officer of the TRP, a member of the Executive Committee, the Republican Party of the County where the individual resides, or a Republican elected official. The State Chairman may require additional verification that the individual in question is indeed a bona fide Republican, and shall have final authority to make the determination.

If a person does not, qualify as being in good standing, the C&C Committee notifies them in writing as to what the deficiency was and an Alternate takes that Delegate position. A and C can be a bit subjective, so the reality is (B) is the objective choice for quick acceptance/rejection of being bona fide.  The Rutherford County Election Commission sells a spreadsheet that quickly allows a registered voter's record of primary choices to be determined. A candidate wishing to run for a position on the County Executive Committee in a Convention must have pulled the GOP Primary Ballot three times out of four primaries to be eligible to enter a Convention race.

Usually Precinct Meetings occur two weeks before the County Convention that selects a new executive committee or Delegated Election (Caucus) that selects candidates to go on a general ballot.

Tiny Numbers Call the Shots

In a county like Rutherford with 48 precincts, 200 to 350 Republicans that understand “The Process” select the local party leadership in a convention or the ballot candidates for an upcoming election by caucus. Typically, precinct meetings do not get 6-7 applicants and many delegate positions go empty. Many times precincts cannot even elect a precinct captain and a temporary 'host' must stand in to fill out the paperwork so the precinct is not completely disenfranchised. This lack of participation concentrates power into an even smaller amount of people.  Low participation in full on elections is a bad thing.  Poor participation at Precinct Meetings, adds significantly to the temptation of special interest groups to insert their members to exert a very strong and broad influence with only a handful of people. Voters excuse themselves from going to the polls because they claim parties only bring poor candidates to the ballot. This is a pernicious cycle because voters' absence at precinct meetings are filled by special interests that get their way by no more than “showing up” to be counted. Believe me. These groups want you to remain uninformed about the Precinct Process and out of the loop.

In Rutherford County, I have been told that the Democrat's “Precinct Process” captures only about 20 percent of the tiny participation that Republicans see.  This means about 50 in-the-loop people that show up get to decide who the leadership will be that represents all the Democrats in the County.  I find it unfathomable that out of 100,000+ Democrats, that there are not at least 100 that are Pro-Constitution, Pro-Free Market, Pro-Rule of Law and Pro-Liberty that would invest a few hours a year to get involved and demand quality candidates do the right thing for their people.  Likely most of the 100,000+ Democrats love the USA, they just don't know “The Process” and use it.

From the research I have done, this exceptionally low turnout is typical, if not endemic, across the US for the Democrat Party.  This may well be an indication of how our current president, with almost no history or political experience found enough convention votes to get to the general election.  With ~3100 counties in the US, 150,000 Democratic precinct votes may have been the key to his election.

Rutherford is nearing a population of 300,000 and literally 300 - 400 folks are selecting who will run both political parties and what kind of candidates they will promote.  The next paragraph is key.

The critical opportunity here is that if just 200 Republicans and 100 Democrats that still believe in the Founders' Constitution simply showed up and became delegates, our governance could be totally changed. The dirty tricksters could be history.   Most counties across Tennessee are much smaller in size. That means that even smaller numbers of pro-Founders folks could make a very big difference.  One rich Crony Capitalist and one rich Progressive Liberal Socialist only get only one vote each. The Middle Class could squash both of these special interests like a flea and in a heartbeat, if they only would “show up”, understand what is happening and vote.

You can be part of this reform process if you will take the time to understand the Precinct Process, get connected and clean up our house. Everyone I know wants a return to sanity with good people at the helm. We must improve the quality of candidates we send to handle the peoples' business. That is in everyone's best interest for the long run.

Legacy Republican or Tea Party.

Direction is more important than speed.

Bruce Cavender - July 9, 2014


Links & Further Reading

The 5000 Year Leap

Chinese Cultural Revolution

Chinese Universities Embrace British Model vs Mao

Normalcy Bias


The Precinct Process Links

Use “precinct process strategies” with your favorite search engine. There is a massive amount of helpful information available where people like you have blogged about what works and what does not.

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

Principles, Power & Precincts - Part II

---This is Part II of a three part series, here's Part I and Part III---

Part II of Bruce Cavendar's insightful article, "Principles, Power, and Precincts".


Part II, Principles and Power

Are principles still important today or have they become mostly unnecessary in our “post-modern” society? One congressman unwittingly summed up the problem of ignorance about principles when he stated that “the Constitution is 100 years old”, attempting to imply irrelevancy.

As an engineer with four decades under my belt, I have seen principles obeyed and principles abrogated. Consider this question: Would you trust an unprincipled engineer to design your jetliner wings, river bridge or electric transmission lines over your head? I have seen these handled correctly as well as the fatal aftermath of rare failures of all three. The bottom line is that when principles are ignored, people inescapably endure disaster, pain and death.  Read that last line again.

Principles related to economic, legal and political systems are only different from the prior example by the scale which disaster, pain and death can reach. This is why that there is no more important educational process than to understand the different types of political systems and their consequences.

The book (and audiobook), The Five Thousand Year Leap, speaks to how the observance of the principles of natural law allowed the United States to produce achievements in two hundred years that had not been made in five thousand.  To go from axes to chain saws, voodoo to magnetic resonance imaging and ox carts to space ships is inarguably the greatest leap in civilization in 5000 years … and worth studying thoroughly. The deeply reasoned philosophy and processes that the Founders and State Legislators of the time worked a miracle unheard of in human history. I cannot recommend this book/audiobook more strongly to every person that loves their current life in the USA and has the desire to see their children enjoy the personal freedom and liberty that is not diminished or destroyed. What country and system of government would you move to if for some reason the freedoms, liberty and economic opportunities of the USA were no longer available here. To deny that the United States could sink back to third world status in healthcare alone would be a gross failure of imagination.

The book enumerates 28 principles that are responsible for the success of the United States. The first three are especially important right now to our Country's health and survival.

Principle 1:  The only reliable basis for sound government and just human relations is Natural Law.

Principle 2:  A free people cannot survive under a republican constitution unless they remain virtuous and morally strong.

Principle 3:  The most promising method of securing a virtuous people is to elect virtuous leaders.

Simply put, without the Rule of Law, free people that do not choose to exercise moral behavior by selecting virtuous leaders, must become slaves to the tyrant with the biggest fist and largest gun.

We only need to look back to the 1960s and study what happened to citizens during Chairman Mao's “Cultural Revolution” to see a modern example of what our Founder's spent so much time to avoid by investing the power in the People through a three branch, 'limited' government with checks and balances rather than a monarch or dictator.  Mao's famous statement … “That all Political Power comes from the barrel of a gun” is an apt confirmation of a tyrant's desire to rule over slaves unable to challenge even their slightest whim. Narcissism and the desire to enslave others is a fault of human nature … which is also as timeless as natural law.

It is interesting to note that most of today's high level leaders in China came of age during Mao's central micromanaging control, purges and genocide. They saw first hand the destruction and death of those that were summarily deemed 'politically unacceptable' (politically incorrect?) The horrific suffering, though largely unacknowledged, is clearly not lost on them today. The Chinese are not to be underestimated. They are beginning to study in depth how long lived countries deal with change through reform rather than revolution.  That link to the article in The Guardian, gives insight into Chinese Universities that are now studying the writings of Edmund Burke, Alexis de Tocqueville among others of our Founders' time that advocate for reform over time, but admonishes against pushing citizens to revolution that brings unnecessary mayhem and death to a country. Consider our direction right now.

A couple years back, I had lunch with a very respected businessman and past Chairman of a local political party.  After discussing numerous political problems, he summed up the situation with a single quote:  “Direction is more important than speed.”

People living today in the USA have never seen revolution on our soil and largely believe it cannot happen. What has always been, will always be.  This is normalcy bias. It is dangerous and totally illogical to believe as impossible. The educational system certainly is not the same as several decades ago, along with entitlements, debt, militarization of the police, invasions of privacy among others.

In terms of personal freedom, Mainland Chinese are still far, far worse off than citizens of the USA, but they are moving in the right direction. Business, science, technology, education and governance. We are not. 

Direction truly is more important than speed.

So what can we do?  The answer lies in the first three principles above.

ONE: We must study and understand why moral behavior is a prerequisite to our nations' survival.

TWO: We must demand of ourselves a return to competent, virtuous and moral behavior.

THREE:  We must publicly and soundly rebuke those that believe they are above our national, state and local laws and can abrogate them at will (this includes the bylaws of our political parties).

If we cannot understand these principles, take them to heart and put them into practice we risk losing the benefit of the 5000 Year Leap that we received on a silver platter from our forebears. Returning to the misery of third world status is the judgment we face from immutable Natural Law should we choose to disobey. We must recognize evil for what it is and treat it so. The Unprincipled are actively destroying our nation.

Power

A number of years back we spoke with a wise, very well respected Legislator who was a Rutherford County native. They quietly believed that reform was critical, but couldn't take a stand for personal reasons.  Their explanation of how the local political culture worked proved to be an excellent insight. Historically, there was a very small group of folks that viewed themselves as community 'leaders' who operate in the 'best interests' of the people and everyone else essentially acquiesced under that leadership. This group was unelected and nontransparent. The system worked relatively to the benefit of the County during the time when it was more rural and genteel, but as land values skyrocketed and large sums of money came to the County, a shift occurred from benevolence to self benefit. Despite the strong facade of Democrats vs Republicans in the county, there is a small number of 'leaders' whose 'party loyalty' quietly fell second to their economic benefit. This kind of structure is neither transparent to the public nor surprising when considered, but the takeaway is that its easy for a neophyte in political waters to be bitten at an inopportune time if they are unaware of the situation they are dealing with.  Money talks, cliques form, plans are hatched. It is a negative, but it can and must be dealt with.

In the past five years there have been numerous instances of support by members of one party for another that has more to do with connections, business relationships or quid pro quo support for future circumstances. Some very subtle and some laughably obvious. A few that publicly speak the loudest about the importance of party loyalty are the worse offenders and have zero reticence about destroying their internal party structure over a single issue that benefits themselves or their clique. Ugly, but true. Deal with it, get over it. It is not going to go away by itself.

After only being involved for a short period, it became clear to me that the vast majority of middle class citizens are deeply disaffected with local political parties. Over time, even “Disaffected” didn't really come close to describing it. Most expressed their distress with words I will not use here. Even worse, what I wasn't to discover until a few years later was that the thinking middle class is not really wanted in the process by those who are very entrenched. Frankly, “unwelcome” would be the polite term that I would use here to describe the efforts by people with 'special interests'.  Put yourself in the position of being a very small number of people that want to exercise significant political power. Maybe that power makes you a lot of money. Especially so long as people don't look too closely at what you are doing. Would they welcome a large cadre of folks looking in-depth at their budgets, decisions and always sniffing for conflicts of interest in their conduct of the People's business?

The answer is “not only no”.

Having 40 hours a week to dig into this, I became far more involved than simply voting in the Precinct Process. When I objected to bylaws being abrogated, I was blocked out. When special interest forces manipulated to reverse valid votes, my protests were ignored.  Even though I was just a single vote, that was threatening enough to certain special interests to send me a 'message' by shooting our car windows out. (The same day a close friend that worked with me politically also had a car window shot out.)  Additionally, I was approached twice by different 'ladies' that held out the possibility of a 'personal liaison' (not the way they expressed it). It doesn't take an IQ of 200 to recognize a blatant attempt at political manipulation, but I was at first taken aback at the cowardice and raw evil that was actually at work behind the scenes. This was a wake up call for someone trying to see the good in all people.  The few in the opposition that would do this showed just exactly what they were made of.  Pure Evil.  This only redoubled my determination to root out the worst of those that are corrupting our system and literally making war on the Middle Class.

To be honest, at first I kept these indiscretions quiet, as I thought them an embarrassment to the organization. I certainly didn't like to talk about them. It was ugly.  When I saw others run into dicey situations, most just threw up their hands and quit. Good people really don't want to be anywhere near those kinds of activities.  Then one day it hit me.  The steady stream of bad behavior, dirty tricks, etc. was not random, but clearly intentional. Maybe they are even funded. Think about it.  If your special interest clique is very small in number, is it easier to sell the idea that your clique should get to call all the shots to a very large number of people or would it be easier to just keep the party organization in the state of extreme weakness by constant disruption to where it cannot be effective against you?  Would there be any real surprise that those that believe 'the ends-justify-any-means' would choose that?

I have been called every name in the book from “Nutjob” to “Anti-Capitalist”.  The irony of the situation is that all the vitrol sent my way was a result of just calling for obedience to the Rule of Law (and bylaws) and basic principled behavior.  (“Nutjob” was a fun term of endearment, but “Anti-Capitalist” was the most hilarious after I spent twenty years allocating capital for large projects in a Fortune 100 company, among others, before retiring to Rutherford County.)

While this juvenile behavior is ugly and needs dealt with, there are even worse concerns. I was researching a budget question in a state office in Nashville and one of the meeting attendants was a legislator. I stopped him alone in a quiet hallway to ask about a current bill that would strip Constitutionally elected County Officers of handling citizens' money and setup an unelected official in their place. I was not ready for his response. This legislator looked at me and said “I think we need to do away with the Constitutional Officers and have them appointed by the County Mayor.”  Stunned, my job dropped. His plan was even worse than what the bill would do. All I could say was “Why?”.  He just pointed out to the street many stories below us. He said … and I quote … “The People are too stupid to elect someone smart enough to do the job.”  I was at once struck with the pure, absolute arrogance of this legislator's disregard of those that trusted and elected him. Secondly, I was struck by the fact that if his logic carried, then he was incompetent to fulfill his duties by his own admission.  I was heartbroken as I had deep trust in this person that was just completely shattered. I was angry with myself for not vetting him better for my support. Clearly we had elected an unknowledgeable, unprincipled legislator that was in favor of writing a bill that would take away power from the People's Constitutionally Elected Officers and concentrate it in unelected hands. Like the old movie, Catch-22, it made me think we need to more carefully screen those that just can't wait to get into office.   On the way home, all I could think about was the fact that this legislator had taken “The Oath” to support and defend the Constitution. I have been disappointed in people before, but I never, ever in the entire world expected to be let down so badly by someone that previously acted like they would always defend the People. (This bill failed, but I am confident it will be back.)

So why am I telling you this?  As discouraging as it is, it is instructive for what we need to do and where we need to go. We must understand the ground we are on and what we are fighting for.

First, we need to strengthen ourselves. We are in a fight for what is right.  We must become determined and impervious to our enemy's ploy of “being-as-bad-as-they-want-to-be” to simply scare us out of the game. Evil wins when we give up.

Second, we need to recognize this is a long term battle and understand our enemies.  I have scratched my head over and over when “Republicans” denigrate the “Tea Party”.  If you make up a list of things that people in both of these groups historically hold as principles, it is almost an exact match.  Constitutional Rights, free markets for business, uniform commercial code, equality for all.   However, when you judge people by their actions, many Republicans in government today are committed to gaining and retaining power-at-any-price. The recent election in Mississippi where 'Republican' members joined in league with Democrats to defeat Republicans with Founders' Principles exposes their complete disloyalty to their Party's principles.  This is far from the virtuous expectations that the Founding Fathers demanded in their time. Remember what happens to your airplane, bridge or power lines when you ignore principles?  This is not just political positioning, this is treachery.

I find it interesting to note that those 'Republicans' who scream the loudest against the “Tea Party” do not even realize that it was their own unprincipled activities that spurred the outrage that got the “Tea Party” in their face to begin with.  The 'Unprincipled' created the 'Tea Party'.   If they had not abrogated their responsibilities and the law, I certainly would have stuck to the activities I had planned for retirement rather than focus my resources on fighting with them. 

Full Circle:

We live in interesting times.  Socialist/Communists on the Left still want all the means of production to be property of the State (at their diktat of course) and seek to waste and destroy as much capital as they can in the process.  A portion of the Large Business Community on the Right refuses to obey the discipline of free markets and seek government grants, loans, protections, subsidies, long tax free holidays, restrictions on their competitors, etc to give them big buck advantages and special treatment.

The Progressive/Socialist/Communist bloc is stronger, strategically smarter and more emboldened than ever. Each time they get away with breaking the law, it only makes them try something even bigger.  Crony Capitalists (Crapitalists), also willing to embrace any evil or antisocial behavior, are  traitors that have abandoned their traditional positions of defending the Rule of Law, Free Markets, Freedom and Liberty. Anything goes to get what they want. Only getting caught is deemed bad.  Even though the time frame for their harm to show up is longer, those that have abandoned our Founder's Principles are no less treacherous than the narcissistic Benedict Arnold at Fort Ticonderoga.  Clearly, these are the Bad Guys now.  I regard them as worse than Marxists. At least Marxists understand hanging and tell you to your face that they will hang you given a chance.  Crapitalists' actions are setting up the Middle Class, and ultimately even their own businesses, for destruction … much to the glee of the Progressive/Socialist/Communists that wish to disempower the USA through destruction of our Rule of Law, de-industrialization, skyrocketing energy costs and destruction of our kid's future.  Khomeini executed clueless Leftists that helped him into power. Present day Crapitalists should expect no less.

If we fail to act against this evil, we are giving our tacit sanction and approval to their actions.

Not to act, is to act. 

Sunday, July 13, 2014

Principles, Power & Precincts - Part I

---This is Part I of a three part series, here's Part II and Part III---

Here is a wonderful guest article by Bruce Cavender in which he takes us through his personal political "awakening" and lays out why it is so important for everyone to stick to their principles, become involved in the political system, and why the precinct process is the best way to affect change in our communities.

I want to thank Bruce for taking the time to write this and for his continued efforts.

Part I, an Introduction


When Jacob asked me to write this article about the Precinct Process, my first thought was that I could knock it out in 20 minutes because the basic mechanics of how to participate in this very influential process are simple and straightforward. At the lowest level of participation, the basic activity can be carried out in a few hours every other year after a person becomes familiar with the procedure.  Even more can be accomplished by those willing to invest even a modest amount of time.

However, to only explain the mechanics of “The Process” in isolation would be about as valuable as walking into a movie halfway through. So I took a deep breath and expanded the scope to put together a cogent analysis … that basically could only be delivered by alternative media and link sharing among people that are deeply concerned about where our Country is going.

My goal here is to promote the understanding of (a) the context of how the Process works, (b) how special interests are involved and, maybe most important to understand, (c) how citizens' lack of participation actually becomes a sanction of the very waste and injustice that plagues us. Many, many people feel system reform is necessary for a broad array of reasons. As an old systems engineer and business manager, much of what is wrong, the waste, corruption and injustice, jumps out at me like sparks from a downed electric pole or blood spurting from an artery.  We have significant problems that threaten to cause great harm to our Country right at our doorstep. People are awakening to these threats and becoming involved to solve them. We need every hand on deck to do what is right for our County and our Country, especially younger folks. We have let much get out of hand and there is much to do.

I also want to pass along discussion about certain key principles that the United States was founded upon because of their exceptional relevance, no, necessity in making our situation better.  The United States of America is the greatest 'startup' this planet has ever seen. My greatest wish is to see it endure for my children and people who are like Thomas Jefferson that appreciates dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.

It is clear that there are those that do not share the Founders' understanding and philosophy about how and why their system works. Too many are totally ignorant of how our system came to be. There are also those that want to destroy the Founders' model completely and make no bones about doing it. Some because they truly are tyrants like the Founders risked their lives to protect us from … others because they simply seek money and power and really don't think about the consequences of selling rope to those that would hang us. The worst offenders among us are those just don't care about injustice, waste and who gets hurt in the disaster they create while they are 'getting theirs'.  Over the last five years, our reform process has seen numerous successes, but it needs to be taken to the next level. We must fully understand what the higher level problems are and how to work within the system to bring about the reform that is necessary to prevent the loss of freedoms and liberties for ourselves and our children.  Let's start by thinking about you, the reader, personally.

A Question:

“Why should you become involved in the Precinct Process anyway?  Or put a different way … “What are the consequences if enough people like you do not become involved in the Precinct Process?


The Precinct Process is not taught in our schools, there is seldom free food, the people can be grumpy and you will not be remunerated for your time. Why not just stay home and turn on your thousand channel cable and zone out?  You work 40 hours a week. You pay your bills. You raise your kids right and set a good example for them. Maybe you even volunteer in church or civic organizations to try to help others. You vote, sometimes, even though you have this strong, nagging feeling that doing it 'makes no difference' … but can't logically put your finger on a solid reason why.

But that's all we need to do to be good citizens, right?  Besides … Politics … it’s a dirty business … who would want to be associated with that?  This, as it turns out, is a pivotal question to ask and far more important than I ever could have imagined when I joined “The Process” five years ago.

The description above was me for 35 years. I worked, I voted … in the big elections, but I left the rest for 'somebody else' to do.  I was a “Sheeple”. However, not to act, was to act. By not participating in governance of my County and Country, I gave my 'personal sanction' to all of the injustice and ills that were being visited upon us. I was guilty.  However, 2008 was a watershed year where it was clear to me the 'system' had come off the rails in a number of important ways. It was reaching inside our home and I wanted to know why. I felt that the system was directly threatening my children and without intervention, my kids specifically would not have even the basic chances at personal and economic freedom that my wife and I had enjoyed.  This was on our radar as a real threat.

Instead of a golfing retirement, I spent five years looking at where our Country came from, what it was doing, where it was going and who is taking us there. I have talked candidly with executives in our federal, state and local governments. Ditto regional Fortune 100/1000 companies, Mom & Pop family businesses and lot of regular citizens. Universally, everyone individually knows that 'something is wrong', but they don't know where the problem lies or how to do anything about it. Well, they are right. Something is wrong. Fortunately, there is much to do about it, but as with any problem, it must be properly understood before it can be solved. A problem buried, is a problem unresolved.

Let me share my wake up call and part of my journey to see if it resonates with your experience.

Dinner:

After clicking off another upsetting newscast halfway through, our family sat down for a weekend dinner. My son was home from his university and told us about a professor that interrupted a group of students taking a critical final exam by barging in and announcing “Half you are going to fail and wash out of this program!” I was incredulous. This kind of despicable behavior by a person in 'authority' could not be happening in a learning environment ... not in a “prestigious” university classroom. When I expressed my shock to my son, he simply frowned, looked me in the eye and said “I can give you the phone numbers of five of my classmates who were there.” I wanted to escalate this incident to his chairman, dean, university president or the media, but my son told me I couldn't or he would never have a chance to graduate because of retribution. I was floored. I was angry because my son was being harmed, our family money was being wasted and there was not single thing I could do about it without making the situation worse for him.

From the other side of the dinner table, my daughter told me about an electronic media arts history professor at her university that was requiring them to memorize 5000 individual photographs, the names of the photographers, the dates taken and the technologies used to develop each of them. 5000?  I thought, this is a “university” level course? I remember thinking, with my poor memory, I would have zero hope of passing this 'course requirement'.  Wait. Why is this even happening?  The reason for studying the leaps of historical achievement is so students have the chance to blaze new trails ahead … innovating in the here and now just like the great leaps of the past. Right?  No. My daughter's tuition money being spent to indoctrinate her with skills of basic, dulling, rote memorization. “University”?  Was this to prepare her for a career competing against a $60 multimedia database program that would be 100,000 times faster than her and perfectly accurate every time?  Nope. On further digging, this prof had a track record of grinding down students into dropping his class and failing half of those that attempted to actually make it through. My daughter similarly feared retribution and my hands were tied again.  To my daughter's credit, she passed the class, the second time she took it, but all I could do was shake my head at the malinvestment of tuition money in a mismanaged educational system and her time that was wasted forever.

Something was very wrong here and it hit me like a baseball bat to the face. The system that had worked for my wife and I nearly a half century ago was now clearly harming our children. Our students were unhappy and we were furious. Our money was disappearing and we were getting nothing for it.   Most worrisome, our student’s future prosperity was being threatened.

The Moon:

I clearly remember a different time. In the 1960s and 1970s, those in our educational system had their marching orders to produce students proficient in science, technology, engineering and math.  I will never forget John F. Kennedy's speech setting the goal of putting a man to the moon. I remember my eyes growing large. What inspiring leadership! Later a fellow from NASA showed up at my high school. After showing some slides and models, he lit a small kerosene lamp on the front of the stage and while describing a rocket engine, he lifted a gloved hand holding a flask of liquid oxygen as high as he could reach and let the stream pour out onto the burning lamp. The liquid stream turned into a mist just above the small flame. As the oxygen touched the flame, that dinky little lamp filled the auditorium with a rocket's roar that set everyone back in their seats. This tiny demonstration got inside our heads. Everyone talked about it incessantly and we left that day thinking differently.  Anything seemed possible to us … because those teaching dared us to think it was. The road ahead was clear and we were welcomed to it. Those teaching were rooting us on. We were to do great things. In retrospect to me, it was a defining moment for many students that day.

The Teachers working behind the scenes that orchestrated this simple demonstration wanted us to succeed. They wanted to motivate us to success. They got it. Now contrast the leadership and vision of that line of thinking to those of the university profs that have done everything possible to set up students to fail through behavior like I just described.  Either they are are hopelessly incompetent or they have a covert mindset intentionally designed to rob students of both their tuition money and their future economic prosperity.  Clearly, neither of those two situations are good or acceptable … let alone be allowed to continue.  $100s of millions of dollars of palatial campus buildings do not guarantee a mind capable of logical, critical thinking … let alone a mind that is full of enthusiasm for learning every day going forward. Don't just take my word for this.  Ask any university student now out looking for good paying, meaningful work about how useful they feel their classes were for their future economic prosperity.  Do you see enthusiasm or burn out?  If you see Burn-Out, you have confirmation of my problem.

Now if you are still with me, it is likely that you have also experienced some defining off-the-rails moment and need a way to make the situation better. 

The news is bad and good.

Bad news:

The bad news is that there is a significant number of people out there that are willing to do unethical, even evil, things to get their way and many of them are in positions of political and government power.   Many that are out of bounds are simply self serving or ignorant of the right path, thus open to correction. A small handful are very aware of the impropriety of their actions, but the end goal of power-at-any-price is the justification for their means.  These people are incorrigible and must simply be removed from the 'system'. Our situation is not unique. This has occurred for millenia and is simple human nature. Similar situations in history developed only two ways: (1) descent into destruction or (2) reform back to health. The actions of the People and their leaders determine the outcome.

Good news:

The good news is that the self-serving, unethical or just plain evil guys' numbers are small relative to people that need free markets, a stable rule of law and fiscal sanity in our nation and that every one of them can be removed, from all levels of government, national through local, by the voters. When a large enough number of people tire of corruption and become involved, they can be taken out, but there is no guarantee. The only question is will the system be cleansed via an orderly reform process or will there be a systemic moral and economic convulsion with an unnecessarily dangerous probability of uncontrolled mayhem, disaster and even death. There is a tsunami coming either way and it is time to choose our ground.

Saturday, June 7, 2014

So What is the GOP Round table?


Put simply, the GOP Round table is a weekly discussion group that is open to the public. Every Friday at 5 pm, at the Rutherford County Republican Party headquarters at 111 E. Main St. engaged citizens come together to talk about a host of issues that concern local and national politics.

The round table began in mid-2013 and has been going strong ever since. The host of each week's round table usually prepares several potential topics for discussion and then allows the free flow of ideas from the group. Sometimes we come up with real solutions and other times we simply talk about that week's major news stories. There have been three primary hosts, Jo Anne Skidmore, Andrew Anderson, and recently, your's truly, Jacob Bogle. We have also had several guest hosts. 

(From the left: Heather Dawbarn - Register of Deeds, Jim Tracy - TN Senator, Brian Patterson - City Council Candidate)


Within the context of the round table, participants are able to learn a great deal about local politics and can meet at least one current elected official or candidate for office. Over the months, by my count, there have been around three dozen elected officials and candidates appear at the round table, with four being nearly weekly attendants. Beyond office holders, business owners, political activists, students, and everyday citizens regularly attend.  

Conversation can vary greatly week-to-week, and for that matter, minute-to-minute. We have had discussions on city and county budgets, problems of corruption, red-light cameras, the national debt, the war on terror, civil liberties, drug legalization, the healthcare industry, education and much more. Everyone's input is desired and everyone's views are respected, however, debates do happen and they've always been great fun. Over the course of the evening we can also end up talking about local history, personal and family stories, international affairs, and from time to time the host may bring historical artifacts or foreign currency to complement that evening's conversation. The round table usually ends at 7 pm, but people are free to come and go as they please.    


The round table is also a great opportunity to network with others, make new friends, and get plugged in to a number of different causes - political and otherwise. So, if you enjoy serious, and not-so serious, conversation with a group of great individuals please stop by one Friday. There are snacks, and while it is hosted by the county GOP, it is open to the public



For more information:




Thursday, May 8, 2014

2014 Rutherford County GOP Primary Results


On May 6, 2014, the Rutherford County Republican Party held their primaries for the upcoming general election on Aug. 7, 2014. There were 58 Republican candidates vying for 37 positions. According to the County Party, this is the largest number of qualified candidates for the GOP primary in County history.

The race had a number of highlights, interesting outcomes and some controversies. Of course, in any local election things tend to be more colorful than on the federal level - regardless of party or position.

Here are some of the highlights:
1. There were 19 incumbents who won their primaries and 18 new candidates who won. Of the winners, 20 ran unopposed.
2. Gerald Melton (incumbent) won his primary despite having his credentials challenged and fierce competition.
3. Joe Frank Jernigan (incumbent) won his primary even though he has been caught up in a scandal involving stealing campaign signs.
4. Phil Griffin, a Mississippi native and campaign strategist, lost his bid to be Commissioner in Dist. 7 to Michael Kusch (also a new candidate) by over 17%. To my knowledge, only one of Griffin's several clients managed a victory - Sheriff Robert Arnold.
5. Sheriff Robert Arnold did win the primary 59.84% to 39.5%. However, his office has been plagued with controversy and he will be in for a tough general election.
6. Melissa Harrell narrowly beat incumbent Laura Bohling for Circuit Court Clerk is a three-way, hotly contested race. Each candidate pulled over 30% with Melissa winning 37.71%.

General voter totals:
In all, 15,074 people turned out to vote in the primary with a reported voter turnout percentage of 2.13%, however, this figure is likely to be wrong. According to County records, as of May 2013 there were 122,724 registered voters in the County. The number of registered voters is roughly 44% of the entire County population, so for 2014 there would be approx. 128,000 voters. Based solely on those numbers, the real voter turnout is more likely to be ~11.8%.

In the same 2013 period, there were 38,226 registered Republicans in the County (or 31.1% of all registered voters). Of course, this primary was open which means anyone could vote in it, however, the same could be said for previous primaries which makes me think the 38,226 figure is fairly accurate. If we adjust for 2014, there should be around 39,800 registered Republicans in the County; so then 37.87% of Republicans voted in this year's primary.

The largest race was for County Mayor with 14,510 votes cast and the smallest was for Dist. 1 Commissioner with only 113 votes cast for that position. The largest Commissioner primary was for Dist. 2 with 1,441 votes.

Based on averaging the percentages below, voter turnout is closer to 10.9% than 2.13%, and that is pretty close to the estimate I calculated above.

The total number of votes* for each district are: D1 - 132 votes (2.13% turnout), D2 - 1,486 (22.85%), D3 - 669 votes (10.36%), D4 - 966 votes (14.4%), D5 - 260 votes (4.1%), D6 - 1,030 votes (13.2%), D7 - 714 votes (8.95%), D8 - 1,004 votes (12.43%), D9 - 604 votes (15.16%), D10 - 501 votes (6.9%), D11- 493 votes (7.31%), D12 - 301 votes (5.35%), D13 - 573 votes (7.91%), D14 - 1,646 votes (18.82%), D15 - 1,099 (19.91%), D16 - 703 votes (9.76%), D17 - 315 votes (12.41%), D18 - 597 votes (9.15%), D19 - 526 votes (7.76%), D20 - 715 votes (8.33%), D21 - 739 votes (10.82%).

*This number includes votes for all offices which is why it's higher than the number of votes for just the respective Commissioner's primary. Vote counts and percentages come from the Election Commission.

Below are the names of those nominees that will represent the GOP in the upcoming general election. Incumbent victory in bold.

Circuit Court Judge 16th Div I – Jeffery L. Peach - unopposed, won 99.51% out of 9,975 votes
Circuit Court Judge 16th Div II – Nathan Nichols - unopposed, won 99.63% out of 9,263 votes
Circuit Court Judge 16th Div III – Keith Siskin - unopposed, won 99.77% out of 10,065 votes
Chancellor 16th Judicial D – Howard W. Wilson - unopposed, won 99.7% out of 10,061 votes
Dist Atty Generl 16th Dist – Jennings H. Jones - won 62.21% out of 12,616 votes
Public Defender 16th Dist – Gerald L. Melton - won 51.5% out of 11,929 votes
County Mayor – Ernest G. Burgess - won 57.86% out of 14,510 votes
County Commission Dist 01 – Doug Shafer - unopposed, won 94.69% out of 113 votes
County Commission Dist 02 – Steve Pearcy - won 59.54% out of 1,441 votes
County Commission Dist 03 – Will Jordan - unopposed, won 99.4% out of 504 votes
County Commission Dist 04 – Jon Jaques - unopposed, won 99.32% out of 587 votes
County Commission Dist 05 – Carol Cook - unopposed, won 99.51% out of 204 votes
County Commission Dist 06 – Joe Frank Jernigan - won 53.77% out of 967 votes
County Commission Dist 07 – Michael Kusch - won 51.26% out of 595 votes
County Commission Dist 08 – Edward Phillips - unopposed, won 95.1% out of 633 votes
County Commission Dist 09 – Joe A. Gourley - won 67.52% out of 508 votes
County Commission Dist 10 – Brad Turner - won 69% out of 458 votes
County Commission Dist 11 – Rhonda Allen - won 60.17% votes out of 462 votes
County Commission Dist 12 – Robert Stevens - unopposed, won 99.56% out of 226 votes
County Commission Dist 13 – Paul Johnson - unopposed, won 99.52% out of 414 votes
County Commission Dist 14 – Charles Baum - unopposed, won 99.56% out of 1,137 votes
County Commission Dist 15 – David Nipper - won 54.62% out of 844 votes
County Commission Dist 16 – Phillip Sugg Dodd - won 58.91% out of 606 votes
County Commission Dist 17 – Jeff Phillips - won 83.75% out of 277 votes
County Commission Dist 18 – Allen McAdoo - unopposed, won 98.75% out of 401 votes
County Commission Dist 19 – Shawn Kaplan - unopposed, won 98.86% out of 352 votes
County Commission Dist 20 – Trey Gooch - unopposed, won 99.2% out of 499
County Commission Dist 21 – Patsy L. Briley - unopposed, won 98.95% out of 475 votes
County Trustee – Teb Batey - unopposed, won 99.81 out of 11,835 votes
General Sessions Judge Part I – Kevin Hodges - won 50.93% out of 10,170 votes
General Sessions Judge Part II – Barry Tidwell - 38.72% out of 10,597 votes
General Sessions Judge Part III – Toby Gilley - unopposed, won 99.7% out of 10,563 votes
Juvenile Court Judge – Donna Scott Davenport - unopposed, won 99.76% out of 11,384 votes
Sheriff – Robert Arnold - won 59.84% out of 14,011 votes
Circuit Court Clerk – Melissa Harrell - won 37.71% out of 12,785 votes
County Clerk – Lisa Duke Crowell - unopposed, won 99.73% out of 10,901 votes
Register of Deeds – Heather Dawbarn - won 45.27% out of 12,835 votes


To see detailed results, visit the Rutherford County Election Commission's report on the primary.

--Jacob Bogle, May 8, 2014 (visit me on Facebook at Facebook.com/JacobBogle)

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Murfreesboro City Election Results & Commentary


Well it's finally over, at least the City's part anyway.

In the Murfreesboro City elections 7,927 people voted with a turn out of 11.32%. The turn out was substantially higher than that of the last election in 2012. However, the last mayoral election was in 2010 which tends to bring a greater number of voters. Even then, this year surpassed the 2010 turn out of 6,660 votes. Increasing voter turn out was a major goal this year and having an increase of 19% (which is greater than the population growth for that time) means we accomplished it - even though it's still much too low.

Congrats to our new Mayor, Shane McFarland, the three City Council winners Madelyn Scales Harris, Rick Lalance and Doug Young, and our new School Board members Phil King, Nancy Rainier and Collier Smith.

The overall results are here (winners highlighted in yellow):

(click for larger view)

Remember, you could vote for up to 3 candidates for City Council and School Board which means the total number of votes for those races will exceed the the total number of individual voters. The number of people who voted was still 7,927 (but, not everyone voted for people in each race). 

The referendum was to approve moving the date of City elections to coincide with the August elections for County races. This will actually save the City thousands of dollars and should greatly improve voter turnout, plus it just makes things simpler.

The precinct with the highest turnout was #3-1 Leanna Community Center with a 30.7% turnout and the lowest was #19-1 Creekmont General Baptist with zero voters. Here is a list of the total votes in each precinct:

Precinct #2-1 Lascassas School
Voters 61, turnout 11.32%

#3-1 Leanna Com. Ctr.
Voters 66, turnout 30.7%

#4-1 Kittrell Elem.
Voters 5, turnout 2.13%

#4-2 Discovery School
Voters 202, turnout 12.55%

#4-3 Oakland High 
Voters 266, turnout 13.84%

#4-4 Oakland Middle 
Voters 20, turnout 22.99%

#6-1 Whitworth Buchanan Middle
Voters 1, turnout 14.29%

#6-2 Christiana Middle
Voters 85, turnout 5.86%

#7-1 New Heights
Voters 114, turnout 6.44%

#7-2 Barfield Elem.
Voters 245, turnout 7.79%

#8-1 Rockvale Middle
Voters 30, turnout 6.71%

#13-1 Bellwood Preschool
Votes 357, turnout 10.37%

#13-2 Cason Lane Academy
Voters 270, turnout 6.98%

#14-1 Siegel Middle School
Voters 1,104, turnout 25.54%

#14-2 Erma Siegel Elementary
Voters 805, turnout 22.54%

#15-1 John Pittard Elem
Voters 693, turnout 20.03%

#15-2 Northfield School
Voters 687, turnout 16.51%

#16-1 Central Magnet School
Voters 504, turnout 12.05%

#16-2 Mitchell Neilson Elem
Voters 121, turnout 15.05%

#16-3 Lane Agri Park
Voters 98, turnout 4.98%

#17-1 North Blvd Church Of Christ
Voters 328, turnout 8.49%

#17-2 Kingwood Church Of Christ
Voters 27, turnout 2.59%

#17-3 Buds Tire
Voters 17, turnout 3.32%

#18-1 Patterson Park
Voters 423, turnout 10.18%

#18-2 Riverdale High School
Voters 310, turnout 12.91%

#19-1 Creekmont General Bapt
Voters 0, turnout 0%

#19-2 New Vision Baptist Church
Voters 197, turnout 10.24%

#20-1 Blackman United Methodist
Voters 129, turnout 8.02%

#20-2 Blackman High
Voters 205, turnout 6.02%

#21-1 Hobgood School
Voters 270, turnout 7.54%

#21-2 Blackfox Elm
Voters 287, turnout 19.82%